Orthopaedics & Spine Solutions - Eclevar MedTech
Therapeutic Solutions

Orthopaedics & Spine Solutions

Clinician-Led Clinical Evidence for Implantable Devices Under MDR

Dr. Nikhil Khadabadi

Clinician-Led Excellence in Orthopedics & Spine

Dr. Nikhil Khadabadi, MD, MS, MRCS

Chief Medical Officer - Orthopaedics & Spine

"With over 15 years of experience in Orthopaedic Surgery spanning UK , Germany , UAE & India , I bring frontline medical expertise to every trial we design and execute.

At Eclevar MedTech, we don't just run trial, we deliver clinically meaningful evidence that drives regulatory approval, market access, and real-world impact. Our work is rooted in medical science, powered by AI innovation, and executed with precision."

Key Credentials & Leadership Roles

Leading Voice in MedTech Innovation & AI Clinical Trials
Ex TÜV SÜD Reviewer & Regulatory Strategy Expert
Director Clinical Innovation - Milo Healthcare (AI-Powered EDC)
Clinical Advisor - VISOLYR & Srotas Health
Specialty Doctor in Orthopaedics - Walsall Manor Hospital
Fellowship in Joint Replacement - Universität des Saarlandes, Germany
Understanding the Challenge

What is Orthopaedic and Spine Clinical Evidence?

Orthopaedic and spine implants represent one of the most scientifically demanding areas in medical device development. These implants must function safely and effectively inside the body for years or even decades, often under significant biomechanical stress. Because of this, clinical evaluation and post-market follow-up are not one-time activities but continuous responsibilities throughout the life of the device.

Under the European Medical Device Regulation (MDR), manufacturers of orthopaedic and spine implants must demonstrate that their devices continue to perform as intended while maintaining an acceptable risk-benefit profile. Evidence must be robust, traceable, and linked to specific device identifiers such as UDI or implant stickers.

Typical Device Examples

🦴

Joint Replacements

Total hip and knee replacements requiring long-term performance monitoring and osseointegration assessment.

🔧

Spinal Implants

Intervertebral cages, rods, and fusion devices demanding biomechanical stability evidence.

⚕️

Trauma Fixation

Osteosynthesis systems requiring evidence of mechanical reliability and healing outcomes.

🧬

Regenerative Implants

Bone regenerative and joint preservation implants with unique clinical benefit claims.

Eclevar MedTech: Your Evidence Partner

Eclevar MedTech partners with manufacturers at every stage of the device lifecycle. Our teams support early clinical concept studies, pivotal trials, registry integration, and long-term performance monitoring. We help clients navigate evolving regulatory expectations while ensuring that clinical data collection is both scientifically sound and operationally efficient.

FREE RESOURCE

Download Your Free PMCF Cheat Sheet

Get instant access to our comprehensive guide for orthopaedic devices under EU MDR.

Download Now
MDR Compliance

Regulatory and Scientific Requirements

The MDR has transformed how orthopaedic evidence is evaluated. Notified Bodies now require manufacturers to go far beyond literature summaries or bench testing. Every claim made in the Clinical Evaluation Report must be supported by real-world or clinical data reflecting the actual device design and intended use.

Key MDR Evidence Requirements

  • Traceable linkage between the implant identifier (UDI, sticker, or registry code) and the analysis dataset
  • Endpoints that align with the device's clinical claims such as osseointegration, stability, and functional recovery
  • Follow-up periods that reflect the risk class (typically at least two years for Class III implants)
  • Defined strategies for handling missing or incomplete data
  • Critical appraisal of registry and real-world evidence sources

Eclevar's Regulatory Expertise

Eclevar's regulatory and clinical experts include former Notified Body reviewers who have directly assessed orthopaedic submissions under MDR Annex XIV. We understand the nuances of reviewer expectations, from how to phrase performance objectives to how to demonstrate that follow-up design is proportionate to device risk.

Our goal is to help each client achieve a defensible, inspection-ready evidence package that withstands regulatory scrutiny.

Our Process

Our Service Workflow

Eclevar MedTech provides an integrated service pathway that connects regulatory strategy, study operations, and digital data collection into one coordinated process.

1

Clinical Evaluation and Gap Analysis

Our teams begin with a systematic review of existing clinical and real-world data to identify what evidence already supports the device and where uncertainties remain. This forms the foundation for a data-driven PMCF plan under Annex XIV.

2

PMCF Design and Protocol Development

Together with the sponsor, we select the most efficient design—whether registry-based, prospective cohort, or survey-based—to address the identified evidence gaps. Study design always reflects device risk, available data, and Notified Body feedback.

3

Digital Data Capture and Monitoring with Milo Health

Using Milo Health EDC-enabled electronic data capture system, we integrate eSource, registry, and imaging data into one compliant environment. This reduces manual entry, enhances accuracy, and gives sponsors real-time visibility into follow-up progress.

4

Site and Surgeon Engagement

We coordinate directly with investigators and surgical teams to ensure consistent data capture and follow-up adherence. Eclevar's dedicated CRO operations staff manage onboarding, monitoring, and ongoing support across multiple countries and languages.

5

Analysis, Interpretation, and Regulatory Reporting

Our biostatisticians and regulatory writers transform raw data into meaningful conclusions that support regulatory submissions. Outputs include PMCF Evaluation Reports, Clinical Evaluation updates, PSUR inputs, and registry performance summaries.

This structured workflow ensures that every orthopaedic study remains traceable, auditable, and ready for both regulatory and reimbursement evaluation.

WEBINAR REPLAY

Driving Orthopaedic Innovation with Real-World Evidence

Watch our expert panel discussion on how Real-World Evidence is transforming orthopaedic device development and regulatory compliance under EU MDR.

Watch Full Replay
Real-World Evidence

Building Real-World Evidence Networks

Modern orthopaedic evidence generation increasingly depends on real-world data. National and regional registries, hospital databases, and digital monitoring tools provide powerful opportunities to capture outcomes at scale. However, data quality and traceability must be proven before such information can be used in clinical evaluation.

Eclevar supports manufacturers in designing registry-linked PMCF programs that meet MDR standards for scientific validity. We define inclusion criteria, quality controls, and statistical analysis plans to ensure data integrity. Through our collaboration with the Milo Health platform, sponsors can merge registry data with eSource and imaging files to create unified datasets suitable for regulatory use.

Clinical Endpoints

Our experience covers a wide range of endpoints including:

  • Radiographic integration
  • Revision rates
  • Functional outcomes
  • Patient-reported measures (Oxford Hip/Knee Scores)

Advanced Monitoring

We also advise on the incorporation of sensor or wearable data in early post-operative monitoring when clinically justified, enabling real-time performance assessment and early detection of potential complications.

Milo Health Integration

Unified Data Ecosystem

Through our collaboration with the Milo Health platform, sponsors can merge registry data with eSource and imaging files to create unified datasets suitable for regulatory use, ensuring complete traceability from implant to outcome.

Our Team

Our Expertise in Orthopaedics and Spine

Eclevar MedTech's orthopaedic and spine practice combines surgical insight, regulatory depth, and data science.

Led by Dr Nikhil Khadabadi, Orthopaedic Surgeon and Chief Medical Officer (Orthopaedics and Spine), our team has supported manufacturers across Europe, Japan, and India in developing compliant PMCF and RWE strategies for joint, trauma, and spine implants.

Our Portfolio Includes

1

Total Hip and Knee Replacement Systems

Long-term performance monitoring and osseointegration studies

2

Spinal Cages, Rods, and Fusion Devices

Biomechanical stability and fusion rate assessment

3

Trauma Fixation and Osteosynthesis Systems

Mechanical reliability and healing outcome studies

4

Regenerative and Joint Preservation Implants

Clinical benefit demonstration and long-term safety monitoring

Advanced Clinical Capabilities

Beyond regulatory support, Eclevar works with clinical investigators, academic networks, and hospital data teams to create continuous learning loops between design, use, and outcomes. We help manufacturers interpret field feedback and registry trends to drive both product improvement and clinical confidence.

Our collaborations with digital imaging partners and AI specialists allow advanced analysis of radiographs and CT scans to quantify implant performance in real time.

Patient-reported outcome measures are captured through integrated survey modules within Milo Health, ensuring long-term evidence of clinical benefit.

Your Partner of Choice

Why Choose Eclevar MedTech

Eclevar MedTech is more than a contract research organisation. We are a global evidence partner that combines regulatory expertise, clinical insight, and digital technology to accelerate compliance and innovation.

🤝

End-to-End Partnership

We manage the complete evidence lifecycle from protocol to submission with one integrated team across regulatory, data, and clinical domains.

🦴

Orthopaedic Focus

Our team has decades of experience in implant assessment, registry linkage, and surgeon-led PMCF program design.

💻

Digital Integration

The connection with Milo Health enables real-world data collection, automated edit checks, and traceability from implant sticker to report.

Reforming Clinical Evaluation of Medical Devices in Europe