PMCF Surveys · EU MDR Annex XIV

PMCF Surveys that
generate real
clinical evidence.

Not all surveys are created equal. Eclevar Medtech designs high-quality Level 4 surveys, accepted by Notified Bodies as primary clinical evidence.

Level 4 Quality Standard

MDCG 2020-7 compliant methodology for primary evidence.

Annex XIV Acceptability

Built to withstand the most rigorous clinical examinations.

Validated Instruments

Pre-specified MCID and psychometric verification.

MDCG 2020-7 Compliant
Validated Instruments
Primary Evidence Data
Multi-Site Execution
PMCF Survey Options

The right instrument for your data.

👨‍⚕️

Clinician-Focused

Clinical outcome surveys completed by healthcare professionals. Highest regulatory weight according to MDCG 2020-7.

NB AcceptedProspective
👤

Patient-Reported

Validated outcome measures (PROM/ePRO) licensed and scored according to developer specifications.

Licensed PROMPre-specified MCID
📊

Registry-Linked

Surveys coupled with national implant registry data (NJR, EPRD) for cross-validation over the long term.

NJR / EPRDLong Term
Understanding Surveys

What makes a PMCF survey valid under the MDR

A PMCF survey is a structured data collection instrument designed to fill gaps identified in your Clinical Evaluation Report (CER).

The word "survey" is often misleading. Level 4 surveys are methodologically equivalent to clinical investigations.

⚠️ Common Mistake

A survey without a pre-specified Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) is not MDCG 2020-7 compliant. Post-hoc analysis is a frequent cause of non-compliance.

The Eclevar Difference

We start from the gaps in your PMCF Plan. Every instrument uses pre-specified endpoints, validated scales, and defined MCID thresholds before collection begins.

MDCG 2020-7 - ISO 14155:2020

Level 4 Requirements.

01. Validated Instrument

Scientific questionnaires with published psychometric properties. No marketing-style forms.

02. Pre-specified SAP

Sample size justification and MCID success criteria defined upfront.

03. Multi-Site Execution

Minimum of 3 to 5 sites with training and monitoring compliant with ISO 14155.

04. CER Traceability

Every objective must correspond to a specific residual risk from the evaluation report.

Tiered Solutions

Three Tiers of PMCF Surveys.

Clinician Surveys

Captures clinical performance and operator-reported outcomes (HCP).

  • Targeted HCP populations
  • Results-focused design
  • Multi-country / Local languages
  • 50 to 200 respondents

Patient Surveys

Licensed PROM instruments to collect functional outcome data.

  • Full licensing agreements
  • Pre-specified MCID
  • GDPR Pseudonymization
  • eCOA / ePRO Deployment
When to use a PMCF Survey

Four scenarios where a survey is the ideal instrument.

Device Families

When multiple variants require evidence simultaneously. Ideal strategy under MDR Article 61(2).

Long-Term Safety

Class III implants requiring 5 to 10 years of surveillance following initial trials.

Closing CER Gaps

Generate quality-of-life evidence within 4 to 8 months to meet recertification deadlines.

Real-World Evidence (RWE)

Capture experience in populations excluded from trials (elderly, comorbidities).

Platform Technology

MILO: Native Survey Deployment.

The MILO platform includes a native eCOA/ePRO module. Every response is timestamped, stored immutably, and exportable with a SHA-256 checksum for 21 CFR Part 11 compliance.

// SHA-256 DATA INTEGRITY LOCK
EXPORT_ID: ECV-S772-2026
STATUS: DATABASE_LOCKED
CHECKSUM: 4f8a92b1c3d...
AUDIT_TRAIL: COMPLIANT
Free · 30 Minutes · No Obligation

Your current CER should be the last
with a major non-compliance.

Book a gap analysis for your PMCF surveys. We will define exactly what is required to get approval on the first try.

Book a Strategic Call

Reforming Clinical Evaluation of Medical Devices in Europe