EU MDR · Germany · MPDG

Pre-CE clinical investigations in Germany, the sequential way.

Germany moved from a parallel to a sequential submission under the MDR and MPDG. Know which Article 62 / 74(2) pathway applies, what BfArM and the Ethics Committee each need, and how to avoid a returned file.

EU MDR 2017/745MPDGBfArM / DMIDSArt. 62 & 74(2)
Pre-CE mark clinical investigation submissions in Germany, Eclevar MedTech

European Champion

Platinum Award 2026

Eclevar MedTech & Milo Health · xShare × EUCROF Open Call

Led by authority

German submissions, run by German-market specialists.

A sequential submission is unforgiving of a missing document. Ours are prepared by regulatory and clinical operations specialists who know exactly what BfArM and the Ethics Committees expect.

Pierre-Marie Boutanquoi

Pierre-Marie Boutanquoi

CMO & Head of Medical Writing · 15+ yrs

Clinical investigation plans and Competent Authority submissions under EU MDR and national law.

in LinkedIn
Charline Petitdemange

Charline Petitdemange

Lead Clinical Project Manager

Multi-country study start-up, including German BfArM and Ethics Committee submissions.

EU MDR 2017/745MPDGBfArM / DMIDSEthics Committee

Awards, funding, accountability

Europe’s best-rated medical device CRO.

Platinum Award 2026

Platinum Award 2026

Top tier at the xShare × EUCROF Open Call, awarded to Eclevar MedTech and its Milo Health platform, presented at EUCROF 2026 in Amsterdam.

The announcement →

Co-funded by the European Union

Selected through the xShare Open Call for clinical research innovation, Horizon Europe.

xShare results →

Independently reported

Distinction confirmed by an independent third party, the CVBF, also an awardee of the xShare × EUCROF Open Call.

CVBF coverage →

The route

From the legal basis to a validated German submission.

This guide summarises the current requirements for a pre-market clinical investigation in Germany, until the European EUDAMED database becomes functional.

01 / 06

From parallel to sequential

Under the MDD 93/42/EEC, AIMDD 90/385/EEC and the German Medical Device Act (MPG), pre-CE submissions via DIMDI were made in parallel to the Competent Authority (CA) and the Ethics Committees (EC). Under EU MDR 2017/745 and the MPDG, this changed to a sequential procedure — a fundamental shift in how the package is assembled and timed.

02 / 06

BfArM, DMIDS and the CIV-ID

In 2020, DIMDI was integrated into BfArM, and the system is now the German Medical Devices Information and Database System (DMIDS). The submission mask remains familiar, and the CIV-ID is still provided by the DMIDS as it was before.

03 / 06

Which pathway applies (Article 62 / 74.2)

The route applies to clinical investigations under Article 62 and Article 74(2) of the MDR, referenced to MPDG §31.

MDR Art.MPDGDevice classRegulatory statusApplication
62, 70(7)a§31(1)Class I & non-invasive IIaNon-CE, novel device (Art. 62.1 indications)Abbreviated
62, 70(7)b§31(2)All othersNon-CE, novel device (Art. 62.1 indications)Full
74.2, 70(7)a§31(1)Class I & non-invasive IIaCE-marked, new intended useAbbreviated
74.2, 70(7)b§31(2)All othersCE-marked, new intended useFull

04 / 06

Abbreviated vs full application

The class decides the burden: Class I and non-invasive Class IIa devices use the abbreviated application; everything else uses the full application. An important German specificity: non-invasive Class IIb devices are not included in the abbreviated pathway, unlike some assumptions carried over from other jurisdictions.

05 / 06

The sequential submission flow

Because the process is now sequential, the initial submission package must include all required documents — whether for CA review only, EC review only, or both. The EC’s favourable opinion is then added after EC review, when the file is submitted to the Competent Authority.

Practical consequence

  • Assemble one complete package up front, not two parallel ones
  • Sequence the EC and CA steps so the favourable opinion arrives in time
  • Confirm the DMIDS mask fields and the CIV-ID before submitting

06 / 06

How to avoid a returned file

Most German rejections come from an incomplete initial package or a mis-classified pathway. We map your device to the exact Article 62 / 74(2) row, assemble the full sequential package, and manage the EC-then-CA timing so first patient in is not delayed. For the underlying application forms, see our MDCG 2021-8 guide.

Germany at a glance

The route, structured.

Sequential
EC then CA, not parallel
BfArM
DMIDS system, CIV-ID as before
Art. 62 / 74.2
the two investigation routes
MPDG §31
abbreviated vs full application

Talk to a specialist

Submitting a clinical investigation in Germany?

Book a free scoping call. We classify your pathway, assemble the full sequential package for BfArM and the Ethics Committee, and manage the timing.

Book a free scoping call

In a sequential submission, one missing document restarts the clock.

An expert read classifies your Article 62 / 74(2) pathway, assembles the complete initial package for BfArM and the Ethics Committee, and sequences the steps so nothing bounces.

Book a free scoping call

Questions we hear first

Pre-CE submissions in Germany, answered.

Is the German submission parallel or sequential?
Under EU MDR 2017/745 and the MPDG, the German submission is sequential, not parallel as it was under the MDD/AIMDD and the MPG. The initial submission package must contain all documents for both the Competent Authority (BfArM) and the Ethics Committee, and the EC's favourable opinion is added when the file is submitted to the Competent Authority.
Who receives the submission in Germany now?
Since 2020, DIMDI was integrated into BfArM and the system is now the German Medical Devices Information and Database System (DMIDS). The submission mask remains familiar, and the CIV-ID is still provided by the DMIDS as before, until EUDAMED becomes functional.
Which pathway applies, abbreviated or full?
Under MPDG §31, Class I and non-invasive Class IIa devices for Article 62.1 indications use the abbreviated application; all other classes use the full application. This applies to both Article 62 and Article 74(2). Note that non-invasive Class IIb devices are not included in the abbreviated pathway in the German regulation.
Which investigations does this route cover?
It covers clinical investigations under Article 62 and Article 74(2) of EU MDR 2017/745, referenced to MPDG §31(1) and §31(2). Article 62 covers non-CE-marked novel devices; Article 74(2) covers CE-marked devices being investigated for a new intended use.

Reforming Clinical Evaluation of Medical Devices in Europe