Cardiac Rhythm Management · Class III & AIMD · EU MDR

Rhythm devices demand evidence that lasts years.

Pacemakers, ICDs, CRT, ablation catheters and EP mapping sit at the top of the risk scale. We run the Class III and active implantable investigations, the long-term PMCF and the registry evidence that a Notified Body expects for cardiac rhythm management devices.

Pacemakers · ICD · CRT Ablation & EP mapping Loop recorders Class III & AIMD Long-term PMCF
Eclevar MedTech clinical team analysing cardiac rhythm management device data under EU MDR Platinum Award 2026

Eclevar MedTech and Milo took the Platinum Award at xShare & EUCROF.

Top prize in the xShare x European CRO Federation "EHDS & Clinical Research" Open Call, awarded to Eclevar MedTech and its Milo Health platform, presented at the EUCROF 2026 conference in Amsterdam.

Co-funded by the European Union

Horizon Europe · Grant Agreement No. 101136734 · Amsterdam, 2 Feb 2026

Social proof

Trusted by MedTech manufacturers.

Device leaders rely on Eclevar for cardiology and rhythm management evidence. Read all client success stories.

TERUMO Meril NIHON KOHDEN VYGON Coloplast SHOFU ASAHI INTECC RegenLab TERUMO Meril NIHON KOHDEN VYGON Coloplast SHOFU ASAHI INTECC RegenLab
Dr Mark DaCosta, COO at Eclevar MedTech and former TÜV SÜD Notified Body reviewer
Dr Mark DaCosta COO · Former Notified Body reviewer · Senior Consultant Surgeon Former reviewer at TÜV SÜD
Regulatory leadership

Rhythm evidence a reviewer will accept.

Dr Mark DaCosta, COO and former TÜV SÜD reviewer, leads a team that knows how a Notified Body scrutinises active implantable and Class III cardiac devices. We design lead-survivorship endpoints, long-term follow-up and PMCF so the benefit-risk case holds, with in-house CRAs rather than outsourced monitoring.

Ex NBFormer TÜV SÜD reviewer
7Countries with in-house CRAs (UK, DE, FR, SE)
Class III& active implantable (AIMD)
Former NB reviewer Rhythm management ISO 14155:2026
LinkedIn
Compliant with EU MDR 2017/745 ISO 14155:2026 Annex XVI AIMD ISO 14971 GDPR
Device scope

The full arrhythmia device landscape.

From high-energy implants to diagnostic monitors, we cover the cardiac rhythm management portfolio, connecting each to our wider cardiovascular clinical strategy.

01

Pacemakers & CRT

Single, dual-chamber and biventricular resynchronisation devices, including leadless systems.

02

ICDs

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators, transvenous and subcutaneous, with shock-therapy endpoints.

03

Ablation catheters

Radiofrequency, cryo and pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias.

04

EP mapping systems

Electrophysiology mapping and navigation platforms, hardware and software.

05

Loop recorders

Implantable and external monitors for long-term arrhythmia detection.

06

Leads & accessories

Lead survivorship and extraction data, central to the long-term benefit-risk profile.

What we measure

Endpoints built for rhythm devices.

We combine device performance and long-term safety, captured through clinical investigations and registry-based real-world evidence.

Performance

Does the device do its job

  • Sensing, pacing and shock-therapy performance
  • Procedural success and acute efficacy
  • Arrhythmia recurrence and burden
  • Battery longevity and device diagnostics
Long-term safety

Does it stay safe for years

  • Lead survivorship and complication rates
  • Infection and revision tracking
  • Multi-year PMCF follow-up
  • Registry-based survivorship data
How we work

From protocol to PMCF, in five steps.

Aligned with your regulatory strategy and Clinical Evaluation Report.

1

Feasibility

Assess endpoints, sites and the evidence gap for your device.

2

Protocol

Design a Class III or AIMD protocol to ISO 14155:2026 and GCP.

3

Conduct

Run sites with in-house CRAs across the UK, Germany, France and Sweden.

4

Analyze

Statistical analysis of performance and long-term safety.

5

PMCF

Registry and observational follow-up feeding the CER.

FAQ

Rhythm device questions sponsors ask us.

Which cardiac arrhythmia devices does Eclevar support?

Pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) devices, ablation catheters, electrophysiology mapping systems and implantable loop recorders, including Class III and active implantable (AIMD) devices.

How are arrhythmia devices classified under EU MDR?

Most cardiac rhythm management implants are Class III or active implantable devices under EU MDR 2017/745, which triggers the highest clinical evidence expectations, mandatory PMCF and, for implantables, an SSCP.

What clinical endpoints matter for rhythm management trials?

Endpoints typically combine device performance (sensing, pacing and shock therapy), procedural safety, arrhythmia recurrence, lead performance and long-term survival, captured over multi-year follow-up.

Can registries support PMCF for arrhythmia devices?

Yes. Registry-based PMCF and real-world evidence are well suited to rhythm management devices, where long-term lead and device survivorship are central to the benefit-risk profile.

Does Eclevar run the sites itself?

Yes. Eclevar deploys in-house CRAs across the UK, Germany, France and Sweden, handling site initiation, ethics submissions and monitoring with its own team rather than outsourcing.

Guaranteed response within 24 hours

Build the rhythm evidence your device needs.

Talk to our team about your pacemaker, ICD, ablation or EP device, its class and the fastest compliant route to Notified Body ready clinical evidence.

Book a free consultation

Reforming Clinical Evaluation of Medical Devices in Europe