EU MDR · CER · PMCF

How your CER stays alive, through PMCF.

Under EU MDR, the CER is not a one-off. PMCF findings must feed back into it, and into risk management, on a defined cadence. Here is how the loop works.

EU MDR 2017/745Annex XIVPMCF Evaluation ReportPSUR
Updating the CER with the PMCF report under EU MDR, Eclevar MedTech

European Champion

Platinum Award 2026

Eclevar MedTech & Milo Health · xShare × EUCROF Open Call

Led by authority

The living clinical evaluation.

A CER that is not updated is a CER out of compliance. Ours are designed as a loop, not a document.

Pierre-Marie Boutanquoi

Pierre-Marie Boutanquoi

CMO & Head of Medical Writing · 15+ yrs

CERs and PMCF plans under EU MDR and MEDDEV 2.7/1 Rev 4, and Notified Body deficiency response.

in LinkedIn
Dr Mark Da Costa

Dr Mark Da Costa

COO & CMO · 25+ yrs

Cardiac surgeon and former lead Notified Body reviewer at TÜV SÜD. 400+ devices CE-certified.

in LinkedIn
EU MDR 2017/745Annex XIVPMCF Evaluation ReportRisk management

Awards, funding, accountability

Europe’s best-rated medical device CRO.

Platinum Award 2026

Platinum Award 2026

Top tier at the xShare × EUCROF Open Call, awarded to Eclevar MedTech and its Milo Health platform, presented at EUCROF 2026 in Amsterdam.

The announcement →

Co-funded by the European Union

Selected through the xShare Open Call for clinical research innovation, Horizon Europe.

xShare results →

Independently reported

Distinction confirmed by an independent third party, the CVBF, also an awardee of the xShare × EUCROF Open Call.

CVBF coverage →

The loop

From PMCF finding to updated CER.

EU MDR treats clinical evaluation as continuous. The PMCF plan generates data, the PMCF Evaluation Report interprets it, and the CER and risk file are updated in response.

01

The feedback loop

Under Annex XIV, the PMCF plan defines what data you collect post-market. That data is analyzed in the PMCF Evaluation Report, whose conclusions must then be reflected in the CER, the risk management file (ISO 14971), the IFU where needed, and the PSUR.

02

What the update must capture

The updated CER has to show that the benefit-risk ratio remains acceptable in light of real-world data.

Into the CER

  • New or confirmed clinical benefits and their magnitude
  • Newly identified or emergent risks and side-effects
  • Changes to the state of the art and to residual risks
  • Any impact on claims, intended purpose or contraindications

03

How often to update

The cadence scales with risk: Class III and implantables update the CER and PSUR at least annually; Class IIa and IIb at least every two years or when significant new data emerges. A material safety signal triggers an update regardless of schedule.

04

Getting it right

The common failure is a PMCF report that never actually changes the CER. We design the PMCF plan so its endpoints map directly to the CER’s conclusions, so a reviewer can trace each post-market finding to its effect on the clinical evaluation.

The cadence

Continuous, not one-off.

Annex XIV
the legal basis
Class III
CER updated yearly
ISO 14971
risk loop
PSUR
kept in step

Talk to a specialist

Does your PMCF actually update your CER?

Book a free scoping call. We connect your PMCF plan to your CER so every post-market finding lands where it should.

Book a free scoping call

A PMCF report that doesn’t update the CER is wasted work.

An expert read connects your PMCF endpoints to your CER conclusions, so real-world data keeps the clinical evaluation, and the CE mark, valid.

Book a free scoping call

Questions we hear first

Updating the CER with PMCF, answered.

How does the PMCF report update the CER?
The PMCF plan generates post-market data, the PMCF Evaluation Report interprets it, and its conclusions must be reflected in the CER, the ISO 14971 risk management file, the IFU where needed, and the PSUR.
How often must the CER be updated?
The cadence scales with risk: Class III and implantable devices update the CER and PSUR at least annually, while Class IIa and IIb update at least every two years or when significant new data emerges, and any material safety signal triggers an update regardless.
What must a CER update capture?
It must show the benefit-risk ratio remains acceptable in light of real-world data, capturing confirmed clinical benefits, newly identified or emergent risks, changes to the state of the art, and any impact on claims or intended purpose.
What is the most common mistake?
A PMCF Evaluation Report that never actually changes the CER. Designing PMCF endpoints so they map directly to the CER’s conclusions is what keeps the loop compliant.

Reforming Clinical Evaluation of Medical Devices in Europe